Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 03.07.2025 02:15
Thank you.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Why was Meghan Markle's Emmy nomination revoked, and how will it impact her Hollywood career?
What’s next?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Saepe maiores nam debitis sequi corporis quasi quasi dolores.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Let’s just make it real clear:
‘Bravely Default: Flying Fairy HD Remaster’ Review: Not Exactly HD - Forbes
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
NASA sets new potential launch date for Ax-4 mission to ISS - SpaceNews
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
How did it feel to take your first gay BBC?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
What is it like to have an insanely beautiful girlfriend?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
One Fitness Accessory Makes You Up to 7 Times More Likely to Stay Active - ScienceAlert